PERBANDINGAN RISIKO KESEHATAN PENGGUNAAN ADITIF FTALAT DAN NON FTALAT PADA BAHAN PLASTIK KEMASAN MAKANAN

  • Eva Laelasari Puslitbang Upaya Kesehatan Masyarakat, Badan Litbang Kesehatan
  • Athena Anwar
  • Tities Puspita
Keywords: Plasticizer, Phthalate, Non-phthalate, Health risks, Pemlastis, Ftalat, Non ftalat, Risiko kesehatan

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The use of plastic-based food packagings has become an option considering their practicality and affordability. However, it is necessary to be aware of the health risks caused by exposure of phthalate plasticizer additives. This article aims to determine the comparison of risks of using phthalate and non-phthalate as plasticizers by scoping review method. The articles were searched through Google Scholar, Pubmed, and official website portals. After categorizing process, we obtained 41 articles for review refference.  The result showed that phthalates are categorized as toxic compounds which have risks to disrupt endocrine glands activities. One of the phthalate compounds widely used as plasticizer is di-(2-ethylhexyl) phtalat, which is categorized into Group 2B (probably carcinogenic). Human biomonitoring values for six phthalate compounds vary from 0.02 to 8 mg/kg/day, while alternative plasticizer compounds ranging from 100 to 1,000 mg/kg/day. These alternative phthalate compounds are relatively safer because they do not easily migrate into food or drinks. There is no regulation due to phthlate restriction as plasticizer in Indonesia. Therefore, it is necessary to design the relevant regulation and we recommend the safer non-pthalate alternatives for plasticizers.

Keywords: Plasticizer, Phthalate, Non-phthalate, Health risks

 

ABSTRAK

Penggunaan kemasan makanan berbahan dasar plastik menjadi pilihan karena dinilai praktis dan harganya terjangkau. Namun perlu diwaspadai risiko kesehatan dari pajanan aditif plastik berupa pemlastis yang terbuat dari senyawa ftalat. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melakukan tinjauan perbandingan risiko penggunaan pemlastis berbahan ftalat dan alternatif non ftalat dengan metode scoping review. Penelusuran artikel melalui portal Google Scholar, Pubmed, dan situs resmi pemerintah/lembaga. Setelah melalui proses pengkategorian, diperoleh 41 artikel yang digunakan sebagai referensi tinjauan. Dari hasil tinjauan literatur diperoleh informasi bahwa senyawa ftalat dikategorikan dalam senyawa toksik dan berisiko mengganggu kerja kelenjar endokrin. Bahkan salah satu senyawa ftalat yang banyak digunakan sebagai aditif pemlastis, yaitu di-(2-ethylhexyl) phtalat, dikategorikan ke dalam Golongan 2B (probably carcinogenic). Nilai human biomonitoring untuk enam senyawa ftalat bervariasi pada kisaran 0,02–8 mg/kg/hari, sedangkan nilai untuk pemlastis alternatif berkisar antara 100-1000 mg/kg/hari. Senyawa alternatif non ftalat dianggap aman karena tidak mudah bermigrasi memajani makanan atau minuman. Di Indonesia belum ada regulasi yang mengatur pembatasan ftalat sebagai pemlastis, karena itu perlu dirancang regulasi terkait dan merekomendasikan alternatif pemlastis non ftalat yang aman bagi kesehatan.

Kata kunci: Pemlastis, Ftalat, Non ftalat, Risiko kesehatan

References

Albert, O., Nardelli, T.C., Lalancette, C., Hales, B.F., Robaire, B., 2018. Effects of in utero and lactational exposure to new generation green plasticizers on adult male rats: A comparative study with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Toxicol. Sci. 164, 129–141. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfy072
America’s Children and Environment, 2017. Biomonitoring Phthalates.
Amin, F., 2009. EVALUASI MIGRASI DI-(2-ETILHEKSIL)FTALAT DARI BOTOL POLIETILENA TEREFTALAT MENGGUNAKAN GC/MS. J. ITEKIMIA 3, 37–47.
Apel, P., Angerer, J., Wilhelm, M., Kolossa-Gehring, M., 2017. New HBM values for emerging substances, inventory of reference and HBM values in force, and working principles of the German Human Biomonitoring Commission. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 220, 152–166. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.09.007
ATSDR, 2001. TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR DI- n -BUTYL PHTHALATE. Atlanta.
Bernard, L., Eljezi, T., Clauson, H., Lambert, C., Bouattour, Y., Chennell, P., Pereira, B., Sautou, V., 2018. Effects of flow rate on the migration of different plasticizers from PVC infusion medical devices. PLoS One 13, 1–16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192369
Birzul, A.N., Pitilyak, D.A., Videnin, I.I., 2019. Health and Quality Risk Assessment of Bottled Water, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/272/2/022142
Bjorkblom, C., Ericson, M., Nilsson, S., Toumie, E., Wallberg, P., 2018. Substitutes for regulated plasticizers Substitutes for regulated plasticizes. Biol. Reprod. 96, 1105–1117.
BPOM, 2011. PENGAWASAN KEMASAN PANGAN. Indonesia.
CDC, 2017. The Biological Exposure Index: Its Use In Assessing Chemical Exposures In The Workplace [WWW Document]. URL https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nioshtic-2/00179076.html (accessed 10.10.17).
Chemsec, 2019. Replacing phthalates.
ChemSrc, 2020. DEHA [WWW Document]. URL https://www.chemsrc.com/en/cas/103-23-1_336202.html. (accessed 6.29.20).
Choi, J., Aarøe Mørck, T., Polcher, A., Knudsen, L., Joas, A., 2014. Review of the state of the art of human biomonitoring for chemical substances and its application to human exposure assessment for food safety. EFSA Support. Publ. 2015, 321.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2006. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) on a request related to a 12th list of substances for food contact materials. EFSA J. 4, 395–401.
Fasano, E., Bono-Blay, F., Cirillo, T., Montuori, P., Lacorte, S., 2012. Migration of phthalates, alkylphenols, bisphenol A and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate from food packaging. Food Control 27, p.132-138.
Frederiksen, H., Nielsen, O., Koch, H.M., Skakkebaek, N.E., Juul, A., Jørgensen, N., Andersson, A.M., 2020. Changes in urinary excretion of phthalates, phthalate substitutes, bisphenols and other polychlorinated and phenolic substances in young Danish men; 2009–2017. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 223, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.10.002
Guo, Z., Wei, D., Wang, M., Wang, S., 2010. Determination of six phthalic acid esters in orange juice packaged by PVC bottle using SPE and HPLC-UV: Application to the migration study. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 48, 760–765. doi:10.1093/chromsci/48.9.760
Halden, R.U., 2010. Plastics and Health Risks. Annu. Rev. Public Health 31, 179–194. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103714
HBM4EU, 2020. PHTHALATES AND HEXAMOLL® DINCH [WWW Document]. URL https://www.hbm4eu.eu/the-substances/phthalates-and-hexamoll-dinch/ (accessed 5.1.20).
HMDB, 2020. Showing metabocard for Diethylhexyl adipate (HMDB0040270) [WWW Document]. URL https://hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB0040270 (accessed 6.20.20).
Hodges, G., Eadsforth, C., Bossuyt, B., Bouvy, A., Enrici, M.H., Geurts, M., Kotthoff, M., Michie, E., Miller, D., Müller, J., Oetter, G., Roberts, J., Schowanek, D., Sun, P., Venzmer, J., 2019. A comparison of log K ow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods. Environ. Sci. Eur. 31, 1–18. doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0176-7
Human Biomonitoring Commission of the German Environmental Agency (HBCGEA), 2014. Stoffmonographie für 1,2-Cyclohexandicarbonsäuredi-isononylester (Hexamoll®DINCH®) – HBM-Werte für die Summe der Metabolite Cyclohexan-1,2-dicarbonsäuremono-ydroxyisononylester (OH-MINCH) und Cyclohexan-1,2-dicarbonsäure-mono-carboxyisooctylester (cx-MINC. Bundesgesundheitsbl 57, 1451–1461. doi:10.1007/s00103-014-2069-2
IARC, 2000. Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate, in: IARC; Lyon (Ed.), WHO IARC Monographs. France, pp. 149–175.
İçöz, A., Eker, B., n.d. SELECTION OF FOOD PACKAGING MATERIAL, MIGRATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON FOOD QUALITY, in: 1st International Conference on Quality of Life, Center for Quality, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac.
Irawan, S., Supeni, G., 2013. Karakteristik Migrasi Kemasan Dan Peralatan Rumah Tangga Berbasis Polimer. J. Kim. dan Kemasan 35, 105. doi:10.24817/jkk.v35i2.1881
Jamarani, R., Erythropel, H.C., Nicell, J.A., Leask, R.L., Marić, M., 2018. How green is your plasticizer? Polymers (Basel). 10, 1–17. doi:10.3390/polym10080834
Jeddi, M.Z., Gorji, M.E., Rietjens, I.M.C.M., Louisse, J., de Bruin, Y.B., Liska, R., 2018. Biomonitoring and subsequent risk assessment of combined exposure to phthalates in iranian children and adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102336
Kasper-Sonnenberg, M., Kocha, H.M., Apel, P., Rüther, M., Pälmke, C., Brüning, T., Kolossa-Gehring, M., 2019. Kasper-Sonnenberg M, Kocha HM, Apel P, Rüther M, Pälmke C, Brüning T, Kolossa-Gehring M. 2019. Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Spe. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 222, 1084–1092.
KLJ Group, 2020. Tri Octyl Trimellitate (TOTM) [WWW Document]. URL http://kljgroup.com/images/pdf/Speciality/KANATOL-TRIMELLITATES/KANATOL-3800.pdf (accessed 5.13.20).
Liu, Y., Guan, Y., Yang, Z., Cai, Z., Mizuno, T., Tsuno, H., Zhu, W., Zhang, X., 2009. Toxicity of seven phthalate esters to embryonic development of the abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Ecotoxicology 18, 293–303. doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0283-0
METI Japan, 2020. Hazard Assessment of Some Chemical Substances Which Have Been “Suspected to Be Endocrine Disrupters”. Hazard assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate. [WWW Document]. URL http://www.meti.go.jp/english/report/downloadfiles/gED0311e.pdf (accessed 7.2.20).
National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2020. Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate, CID=7641 [WWW Document]. PubChem Database. URL https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Bis_2-ethylhexyl_-adipate#section=Use-and-Manufacturing (accessed 6.17.20).
NCBI, 2016. Phthalates [WWW Document]. URL https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Phthalate (accessed 1.20.21).
Peterson, J., Assistant, R.N., Pearce, P.F., Associate, F., Ferguson, L.A., Associate, F., Coordinator, D.N.P.P., Langford, C.A., 2017. Understanding scoping reviews : Definition , purpose , and process. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Pract. 29, 12–16. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12380
Plastic Europe, 2019. Plastics - the Facts 2019.
Rudel, R.A., Gray, J.M., Engel, C.L., Rawsthorne, T.W., Dodson, R.E., Ackerman, J.M., Rizzo, J., Nudelman, J.L., Brody, J.G., 2011. Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure: Findings from a dietary intervention. Environ. Health Perspect. 119, 914–920. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003170
Rumrill, P.D., Fitzgerald, S.M., Merchant, W.R., 2010. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35, 399–404. doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-0998
Schecter, A., Lorber, M., Guo, Y., Wu, Q., Yun, S.H., Kannan, K., Hommel, M., Imran, N., Hynan, L.S., Cheng, D., Colacino, J.A., Birnbaum, L.S., 2013. Phthalate concentrations and dietary exposure from food purchased in New York state. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 473–479. doi:10.1289/ehp.1206367
Silva, M., Samandar, E., Ye, X., Calafat, A., 2013. In Vitro Metabolites of Di-2-ethylhexyl Adipate (DEHA) as Biomarkers of Exposure in Human Biomonitoring Applications. Chem Res Toxicol 26, 1498–1502.
Tetra Pak, 2020. Packaging material for Tetra Pak carton packages [WWW Document]. URL https://www.tetrapak.com/packaging/materials (accessed 7.9.20).
Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2018. Food Contact Materials. Overview of Regulations Analysis and Trends [WWW Document]. URL https://www.pragolab.cz/files/aktuality/2018-12/ai-72745-food-contact-materials-ai72745-en.pdf. (accessed 6.25.20).
Umweltbundesamt, 2015. Reference and HBM Values [WWW Document]. URL https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/health/commissions-working-groups/human-biomonitoring-commission/reference-hbm-values (accessed 5.26.20).
University of Cincinnati, 2018. TOXICITY REVIEW FOR BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)ADIPATE (DEHA) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Toxicity Review of DEHA.pdf?TSiSSb20aUy68dV0qk1AllBUrIaPFSaE (accessed 6.29.20).
US EPA, 2012. Phthalates Action Plan.
Vliet, E. Van, Reitano, E., Chhabra, J., Bergen GP, Whyatt, R., 2011. A review of alternatives to di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-containing medical devices in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinato 31, 1–7. doi:10.1038/jid.2014.371
Wang, Y., Zhang, B., 2017. The Chemicals Migration Research Of Plastic Food Packaging, in: 2017 3rd International Conference on Environment, Biology, Medicine and Computer Applications(ICEBMCA 2017). pp. 57–61. doi:10.25236/icebmca.2017.12
WHO, 2017. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition, incorporating the 1st addendum. Jenewa, p. p 631.
WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015. Human biomonitoring: facts and figure. Copenhagen.
Wishart, D., Feunang, Y., Marcu, A., Guo, A., Liang, K., Vázquez-Fresno, R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Karu, N., Sayeeda, Z., Lo, E., Assempour, N., Berjanskii, M., Singhal, S., Arndt, D., Liang, Y., Badran, H., Grant, J., Serra-Cayuela, A., Liu, Y., Mandal, R., Neveu, V., Pon, A., Knox, C., Wil Scalbert, A., n.d. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(Database issue). doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1089
Yi, W.E.I., Xiang-Liang, T., Yu, Z., Bin, L., Lian-Ju, S., Chun-lan, L., Tao, L.I.N., Da-wei, H.E., Sheng-de, W.U., Guang-hui, W.E.I., 2018. DEHP exposure destroys blood-testis barrier (BTB) integrity of immature testes through excessive ROS-mediated autophagy. Genes Dis. 5, 263–274. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2018.06.004
Zhong, R., Wang, H., Wu, X., Cao, Y., He, Z., He, Y., Liu, J., 2013a. In vitro investigation of the effect of plasticizers on the blood compatibility of medical grade plasticized poly (vinyl chloride). J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24, 1985–1992. doi:10.1007/s10856-013-4950-1
Zhong, R., Wang, H., Xia, W., 2013b. In vitro investigation of the effect of plasticizers on the blood compatibility of medical grade plasticized poly (vinyl chloride). J Mater Sci Mater Med 24, 1985–1992. doi:10.1007/s10856-013-4950-1
Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Laelasari, E., Anwar, A. and Puspita, T. (2021) “PERBANDINGAN RISIKO KESEHATAN PENGGUNAAN ADITIF FTALAT DAN NON FTALAT PADA BAHAN PLASTIK KEMASAN MAKANAN”, JURNAL EKOLOGI KESEHATAN, 20(1), pp. 21-35. doi: 10.22435/jek.v20i1.3683.