Penggunaan Metode Hybrid e-Learning untuk Praktikum Imunologi Farmasi di Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Gadjah Mada
Abstract
Laboratory work of Pharmaceutical Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy UGM aims to provide skills of applying antigens, antibodies, and immunological techniques in pharmaceutical; and ideally each student should be able to perform it completely. However, the limitation of time and facilities making the learning process ineffective. An innovative learning method such as hybrid e-learning is expected to increase the learning effectiveness. Learning materials and online quizzes/discussions were uploaded and carried out using elisa.ugm.ac.id (eLisa), respectively, combined with on-site works in the laboratory. The method was evaluated by examination scores and final grades. Student participations in online quizzes increased from first to fourth quiz (average participation rate 98.86±0.87%). Compared to the conventional method applied in 2016 (n=207), the examination average score did not increase; however, the percentage of students whose score is 90-100 were higher in the hybrid e-learning. The average final grade of the hybrid e-learning was 81.43±0.70; whereas the conventional method of 2016 was 80.22±5.22. More than 80% students (n=48) expressed easiness in following courses and were satisfied with the online learning materials’ quality. Hence, the hybrid e-learning results positive effects in increasing the effectiveness of the learning process. Development of more interactive online platforms is needed to optimize the learning process.References
Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Panduan akademik program studi ilmu farmasi sarjana strata-1 tahun 2016. Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2016.
Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Petunjuk praktikum imunologi farmasi tahun 2017: Departemen Kimia Farmasi. Yogyakarta: Indonesia, 2017.
Hasanah A. Perbedaan motivasi belajar dan prestasi belajar ditinjau dari pengenalan sistem e-learning [Tesis]. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2006. URL: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/30041
Pamugar H, Winaryo WW, Najib W. Model evaluasi kesuksesan dan penerimaan sistem informasi e-learning pada lembaga diklat pemerintah. Sci J Informatics. 2014 Mei; 1(1): 13-28. DOI: 10.15294/sji.v1i1.3638
Yazdi M. E-learning sebagai media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis teknologi informasi. J Ilmiah Foristek. 2012 Mar; 2(1): 143-152. URL: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Foristek/article/viewFile/665/584
Santosa PI. Usability of e-learning portal and how it affects students’ attitude and satisfaction, an exploratory study. PASIC 2009 Proceedings. 2009 Jul; 71. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2009/71/
Dinata RK. Evaluasi e-learning eLisa menggunakan technology acceptance model (TAM) di universitas gadjah mada yogyakarta [Tesis]. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2012. URL: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/56009
Surizka A. Identifikasi faktor evaluasi tata kelola learning management system (LMS) dalam perspektif mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi indonesia (studi kasus: penggunaan sistem eLOK di UGM) [Tesis]. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2019. URL: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/178573
Hermawan A, Ikawati M, Kristina SA, Meiyanto E. Efektivitas hybrid e-learning mata kuliah kimia klinik dan bioanalisis di fakultas farmasi universitas gadjah mada. JMPF. 2019 Sep; 9(3): 164-173. DOI: 10.22146/jmpf.42718
Azhari FA & Ming LC. Review of e-learning practice at the tertiary education level in Malaysia. IJPER. 2015 Des; 49(4): 248-257.
Hertiani T, Kristina SA, Puspitasarai A, Pramono S. Investigating the impact of a blended learning approach to teach herbal extract production. JAASP. 2020; 9: 32-36.
Ismantohadi E, Nugroho LE, Kusumawardani SS. Prototipe sistem e-learning dengan pendekatan gaya belajar vark (Kasus: Politeknik Indramayu). JNTETI, 2015 Agust; 4(3): 147-156. DOI: 10.22146/jnteti.v4i3.156
Salter SM, Karia A, Sanfilippo FM, Clifford RM. Effectiveness of e-learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Ed. 2014 May; 78(4): 83. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe78483
Nesterowicz K, Librowski T, Edelbring S. Validating e-learning in continuing pharmacy education: user acceptance and knowledge change. BMC Medical Education. 2014 Feb; 14: 33.DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-33
Hess R, Hagemeier NE, Blackwelder R, Rose D, Ansarai N, Branham T. Teaching communication skills to medical and pharmacy students through a blended learning course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Mei; 80(4): 64. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80464
Karaksha A, Grant G, Nirthanan SN, Davey AK, Anoopkumar-Dukie S. A comparative study to evaluate the educational impact of e-learning tools on Griffith University pharmacy students’ level of understanding using Bloom’s and SOLO Taxonomies. Educ Res Int. 2014 Des; 934854. DOI: 10.1155/2014/934854
Fox LM, Pham KH, Dollar M. Using interactive digital images of products to teach pharmaceutics. Am J Pharm Ed. 2007 Jun; 71(3): 58. DOI: 10.5688/aj710358
Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Gadjah Mada. panduan akademik program sarjana program studi ilmu farmasi tahun 2018. Yogyakarta: Indonesia; 2018.
Mohamed MHN, Mak V, Sumulatha G, Nugroho AE, Hertiani T, Zulkefeli M, Dorjbali S, Faller EM, Benosa CAC, Zaini S. Pharmacy education during and beyond COVID-19 in six Asia-Pacific countries: changes, challenges, and experiences. Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep; 20(2): 183-195. DOI: 10.46542/pe.2020.202.18319.
Okoreke M, Williams AE, Emmanuella NC, Ashinedu NU, Mairaj MW. COVID-19: challenges affecting the uptake of e-learning in pharmacy education in Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jun; 35(Supp 2): 70. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.23910
Lorenzoni AA, Manzini F, Soares L, Leite SN. E-learning in pharmacy education: what do we know about it? Braz J Pharm Sci. 2019 Nov; 55: e18100. DOI: 10.1590/s2175-97902019000118100
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
