Tarif Pelayanan Pembedahan Katarak Pasien Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional dengan Teknik Fakoemulsifikasi dan Small Incision Cataract Surgery
Abstract
Abstrak
Prevalensi kebutaan di Indonesia karena katarak pada penduduk berusia ≥ 50 tahun sebesar 3% dan salah satu biaya kesehatan terbesar di tahun 2017 adalah untuk pembedahan katarak. Untuk melakukan pembandingan tarif rumah sakit serta tarif Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBG) pelayanan pembedahan katarak dengan teknik fakoemulsifikasi dan Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) dilakukan penelitian potong lintang menggunakan data klaim Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) Rumah Sakit “X”. Perbedaan tarif fakoemulsifikasi dan SICS dianalisis secara bivariat dengan Mann-Whitney. Dari 1278 pasien katarak, terbanyak adalah pasien laki laki, berumur ≥ 60 tahun, 84,7% pembedahan menggunakan teknik fakoemulsifikasi, dan 77,2% pembedahan dilakukan di rawat jalan. Untuk pelayanan rawat inap, fakoemulsifikasi terbanyak di ruang perawatan kelas 1 (50,0%) dan SICS di kelas 3 (65,4%). Rerata tarif rumah sakit untuk rawat jalan fakoemulsifikasi Rp 9.536.041,- ±1.336.734,03 dan SICS adalah Rp 7.438.924,- ±1.160.666,63 (p<0,05) sedangkan untuk rawat inap fakoemulsfikasi Rp 9.355.253,- ±2.288.647,36 dan SICS Rp 6.078.391,- ±1.854.308,65 (p<0,05). Rerata tarif INA-CBG fakoemulsifikasi rawat jalan adalah Rp 8.809.191,- ±218.193,55 dan SICS Rp 4.410.000 (p<0,05) sedangkan untuk rawat inap fakoemulsfikasi Rp 10.834.039,- ±2.019.676,19 dan SICS Rp 9.074.188 ±1.638.329,7 (p<0,05). Rerata tarif rumah sakit dan tarif INA-CBG untuk teknik pembedahan katarak dengan SICS baik rawat jalan maupun rawat inap lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan teknik fakoemulsifikasi. Tarif INA-CBG yang dibayarkan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan untuk kedua metode pembedahan katarak pada pelayanan rawat jalan lebih rendah sedangkan untuk rawat inap lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan tarif rumah sakit.
Kata kunci: Fakoemulsifikasi, SICS, Katarak, JKN
Abstract
The prevalence of blindness in Indonesia due to cataracts in the population aged 50 years and above is 3%. However, one of the highest health costs in 2017 was on cataract surgery. To compare hospital tariff and Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBG) tariff of phacoemulsification and Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS), a cross-sectional study was conducted using National Health lnsurance claim data at Hospital “X”. The differences between phacoemulsification and SICS tariff were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. From a total of 1278 patients, majority were males, aged 60 years and above. 84.7% of the patients went through a phacoemulsification procedure, 77.2% were outpatients. Most inpatients that went through a phacoemulsification were admitted to class 1 wards (50.0%) while a majority of those went through a SICS procedure were admitted to class 3 wards (65.4%). There were significant differences in the average hospital tariff between phacoemulsification and SICS for both outpatients’ (IDR 9,536,041 ±1,336,734.03 vs IDR 7,438,924 ±1,160,666.63;p<0.05) and inpatients’ (IDR 9,355,253 ±2,288,647.36 vs IDR 6,078,391 ±1,854,308.65; p<0.05) care. The average INA-CBG tariff also had significant differences between both procedures for outpatients’ care (phacoemulsification vs SICS: IDR 8,809,191 ±218,193.55 vs IDR 4,410,000;p<0.05) and inpatients’ care (IDR 10,834,039 ±2,019,676.19 vs IDR 9,074,188 ±1,638,329.7; p<0.05). The average hospital and INA-CBG tariff of SICS, for both outpatients and inpatients were lower than that of phacoemulsification. Although INA-CBG tariffs paid by the Social Insurance Administration Organization for Health or BPJS Kesehatan for both phacoemulsification and SICS procedures in outpatients was lower, the INA-CBG inpatients’ tariff was higher than the hospital tariff.
Keywords: Phacoemulsification, SCIS, Cataracts, National Health Insurance (NHI)
References
The International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness. South East Asia Region [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.iapb.org/iapb-regions/south-east-asia/
Kementerian Kesehatan. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata Laksana Katarak pada Dewasa. 2018.
Jongsareejit, Amporn Wiriyaluppa C, Kongsap P, Phumipan S. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Manual Small IncisionCataract Surgery (MSICS) and Phacoemulsification (PE). J Med Assoc Thai [Internet]. 2012; Available from: http://www.jmat.mat.or.th
El-Sayeda SH, El-Sobky HMK, Badawy NM, El-Shafy EAA. Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery for treatment of cataract. Menoufia Med J [Internet]. 2015;28:191-6. Available from: http://www.mmj.eg.net/text.asp?2015/28/1/191/155987
Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D, Bajracharya L, Kline DC, Richheimer W, et al. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification vs Manual Sutureless Small-Incision Extracapsular Cataract Surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:32–38.
World Health Organization. Priority eye diseases [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/blindness/causes/priority/en/index1.html
BPJS Kesehatan. Efektifitas Terjaga, Mutu Tetap Prima [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/index.php/post/read/2018/861/Efektifitas-Terjaga-Mutu-Tetap-Prima
BPJS Kesehatan. Transplantasi Ginjal Dijamin BPJS Kesehatan. Info BPJS Kesehatan - Edisi 77. 2019;12–3.
Pemerintah Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden RI NO 82 tahun 2018 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. 2018.
Budiarto W, Sugiharto M. Biaya Klaim INA CBGs dan Biaya Riil Penyakit Katastropik Rawat Inap Peserta Jamkesmas Di Rumah Sakit Studi Di 10 Rumah Sakit Milik Kementerian Kesehatan Januari–Maret 2012. Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat. 2013;16:58–65.
Sari RP. Perbandingan Biaya Riil dengan Tarif Paket INA-CBG’s dan Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Biaya Riil pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Rawat Inap Jamkesmas Di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta [Tesis] [Internet]. Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2013. Available from: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/59253
Lewallen S, Courtright P. Gender and use of cataract surgical services in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ [Internet]. 2002;300–3. Available from: https://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862002000400008&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Abou-Gareeb I, Lewallen S, Bassett K, Courtright P. Gender and blindness: a meta-analysis of population-based prevalence surveys. Ophthalmic Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001 Jan 1;8(1):39–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1076/opep.8.1.39.1540
Institute WE. Cataracts FAQ [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2018 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/wilmer/
Mayo Clinic. Cataract Surgery [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 2]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/cataract-surgery/about/pac-20384765
Lundström M, Barry P, Henry Y, Rosen P, Stenevi U. Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: Guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(6):1086–93.
Dickson R, Eastwood A, Gill P, Melville A, O’meara S, Sheldon T. Management of cataract. Qual Heal Care [Internet]. 1996;2:180–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.5.3.180
Fan Z-G, Zhang D-D, Li Z-W, Yang Y, Lin X-F, Zg F, et al. Outpatient Surgery in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center: Promise and Problems. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130:1623–4.
Holland GN, Earl DT, Wheeler NC, Straatsma BR, Pettit TH, Hepler RS, et al. Results of Inpatient and Outpatient Cataract Surgery: A Historical Cohort Comparison. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 1992;99 (6):845–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31882-2
Castells X, Alonso J, Castilla M, Ribó C, Cots F, Antó JM. Outcomes and costs of outpatient and inpatient cataract surgery: a randomised clinical trial. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001;54(1):23–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00271-7
Mojon-Azzi SM, Mojon DS. The rate of outpatient cataract surgery in ten European countries: An analysis using data from the SHARE survey. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1041–1044.
Michela Gianino M, Lenzi J, Bonaudo M, Fantini MP, Siliquini R, Ricciardi W, et al. The switch between cataract surgical settings: Evidence from a time series analysis across 20 EU countries. PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192620 [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192620
Deepti Mahajan, Ram Lal Sharma KPC. Minimal duration cataract surgery with oblique limbal stab incision technique. Oman J Ophthamology. 2017;46(3):155–61.
SK. Singh, Winter I, Surin L. Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries? Nep J Oph [Internet]. 2009;95–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682
Zatila E. Evaluasi Ekonomi Operasi Katarak: Perbandingan Pendekatan Metode Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) dan Metode Phacoemulsification di Klinik Spesialis Mata di Kota Palembang tahun 2008 [Tesis]. Universitas Indonesia; 2008.
NOVARI S. Analisis Biaya Satuan Tindakan Fakoemulsifikasi Tanpa Penyulit pada Operasi Katarak dengan Metode Activity Based Costing (ABC)di RSUD Dr. Achmad Mochtar Bukittinggi Tahun 2016. [Skripsi] [Internet]. Universitas Andalas; 2017. Available from: http://scholar.unand.ac.id/28687/
Rahma CM. Kesesuaian Biaya Rill Dengan Tarif Paket INA CBG’s dan Analisis Faktor yang Berpengaruh pada Biaya Rill Pasien Operasi Katarak di Rumah Sakit Khusus Mata Provinsi Sumatera Selatan [Skripsi] [Internet]. Universitas Sriwijaya; 2019. Available from: repository.unsri.ac.id/2621/
Khan A, Amitava AK, Rizvi SAR, Siddiqui Z, Kumari N, Grover S. Cost‑effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;
Jaggernath J, Parikshit G, Moodley V, Naidoo KS. Comparison of cataract surgery techniques: Safety, efficacy, and costeffectiveness. Eur J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2013;24 (4):520–6. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259456383
Khanna R, Kaza S, Ghanshyam PSS, Sangwan V. Comparative Outcomes Of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery And Phacoemulsification Performed By Ophthalmology Trainees In A Tertiary Eye Care Hospital In India: A Retrospective Cohort Design. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2012;2:e00103. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001035
Zhang J, Feng Y, Cai J. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for age-related cataract: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Exp Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2013;41:379–386. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02868.x
Nanta AM. Perbandingan Tajam Penglihatan Pasca Operasi Katarak Senilis dengan Teknik Phacoemulsification dan Small Incision Cataract Surgery di BLUD Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh [Skripsi] [Internet]. Universitas Syiah Kuala; 2013. Available from: https://etd.unsyiah.ac.id/baca/index.php?id=18203&page=10
Haripriya A, Chang DF, Reena M, Madhu Shekhar. Complication rates of phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery at Aravind Eye Hospital. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2012;38:1360–1369. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.025
