Subtipe Molekuler Kanker Payudara di RSUD Madiun dan Hubungannya dengan Grading Histopatologi

Molecular Subtypes on Breast Cancer in Madiun Regional General Hospital and its Relevance to Histopathological Grading

  • Dadik Subiyanto Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Threeyana Ariyati Kadi
  • Ismaiyah Ismaiyah
  • Naufal Abdurrahman
  • Yudha Prasetyo Utomo
  • Arif Reynaldi Alifiansyah
  • Ika Fidianingsih Universitas Islam Indonesia
Keywords: kanker payudara, ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, grading histologi, breast cancer, histopathological grading

Abstract

Breast cancer is a complex disease with variable molecular characteristics and shows different tumor behavior, therapeutic response, and prognosis. The regional general hospital Madiun has begun to improve services for breast cancer patients since 2015 with the availability of immunohistochemical examinations. This effort was made because breast cancer therapy is currently guided by these examinations. This study aimed to determine the distribution of various molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Madiun Hospital and also the relationship between molecular subtypes and histopathological grading. This study was a retrospective study with a cross-sectional design taken from the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory of Madiun Hospital data from 2015 to 2018. A total of 281 breast cancer cases were examined for immunohistochemical of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), and a total of 91 breast cancer patients plus Ki-67 examination were then classified into luminal A, luminal B, HER2 and triple-negative (TN). The statistical test used was the Chi-Square test with a 95% confidence level. The most common molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Madiun Hospital were luminal B (28,5%) followed by TN (27,5%), luminal A (22%), and HER2 (22%). The mean age of breast cancer patients was 52.8 ± 10.57. The most common histological types and grades of breast cancer were invasive ductal carcinoma (85.1%) and tumor grade 1 (58.71%). There was a correlation between the immunohistochemical features of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 with
histopathological grading. Positive ER and PR were more well differentiated but e HER2 positive and
Ki67 were more poorly differented.

Abstrak

Kanker payudara merupakan penyakit kompleks dengan gambaran molekuler bervariasi dan menunjukkan perilaku tumor, respon terapi, dan prognosis yang berbeda. Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Madiun mulai meningkatkan layanan untuk pasien kanker payudara sejak tahun 2015 dengan tersedianya pemeriksaan imunohistokimia. Upaya ini dilakukan karena terapi kanker payudara saat ini berpedoman atas pemeriksaan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi berbagai subtipe molekuler kanker payudara di RSUD Madiun dan juga hubungan antar subtipe molekuler dengan grading histopatologi. Penelitian ini adalah studi retrospektif dengan desain cross sectional yang diambil dari data Laboratorium Patologi Anatomi RS Madiun selama tahun 2015 sampai 2018. Total 281 kasus kanker payudara dilakukan pemeriksaan imunohistokimia estrogen receptor (ER), progesteron receptor (PR) dan human epidermal epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) dan total 91 pasien kanker payudara ditambah pemeriksaan Ki-67 kemudian diklasifikasikan menjadi luminal A, luminal B, HER2, dan triple negative (TN). Uji statistik yang digunakan adalah uji Chi Square dengan taraf kepercayaan 95%. Subtipe molekuler kanker payudara di RS Madiun yang paling banyak adalah luminal B (28,5%) diikuti TN (27,5%), luminal A (22%), dan HER2 (22%). Rata-rata umur pasien kanker payudara adalah 52,8 ±10,57. Tipe histologi dan grade kanker payudara terbanyak adalah karsinoma duktal invasif (85,1%) dan grade tumor 1 (58,71%). Terdapat hubungan gambaran imunohistokimia baik ER, PR, HER2 dan Ki67 dengan grading histopatologi. ER dan PR positif lebih banyak mengalami diferensiasi baik namun HER2 positif dan KI67 positif lebih banyak mengalami diferensiasi buruk.

References

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Hasil utama RISKESDAS 2018. Jakarta: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2018.

Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends - An update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:16–27.

GLOBOCAN. 360 Indonesia Fact Sheet. 2020 Available at https://www.google.com/ u r l ? s a = t & r c t = j & q = & e s r c = s & s o u r c e=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact= 8&ved=2ahUKEwig5 p 6 5 1 9 7 t A h X n 9 n M B H c w U B Z Y QFjAAegQIBBAC&url =https%3A%2F%2Fgco. iarc.fr%2Ftoday% 2Fdata%2 Ffactsheets%2Fpopulations% 2F360-indonesia-fact-sheets.pdf&usg= AOvVaw2CxCbX3oRrh0R.

Departemen Kesehatan. Info Datin Bulan Peduli Kanker Payudara 2016. 2016. Available at http://

www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/infodatin/InfoDatin Bulan Peduli Kanker Payudara_2016.pdf.

Khambri D, Harahap WA, Yanwiraswati, Haryono SJ, Jamsari. Pentingnya Pemeriksaan Androgen Reseptor (ar) terhadap Penderita Karsinoma Payudara di Sumatera Barat. BioTrends 2015;6:39–45.

Soediro R, Nugroho RS, Gondhowiardjo SA, Poetiray EDC. Karakteristik Subtipe Kanker Payudara Berdasarkan Status Hormonal dan Karakteristik Subtipe Kanker Payudara Berdasarkan Status Hormonal dan Her-2. Radioter dan Onkol Indones. 2010;1:43–47.

Dai X, Li T, Bai Z, Yang Y, Liu X, Zhan J, et al. Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype Classification, Clinical Use and Future Trends. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015;5:2929–43.

Karsono R, Purwanto DJ, Haryono SJ, Karsono B, Sari L, Pratiwi Y, et al. Preoperative Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage 3B and 4 Breast Cancer Patients in Dharmais Hospital-National Cancer Center, Indonesia: A Cohort Study. Rumah Sakit Kanker Dharmais; 2018 Available at https://doi.org/10.33371/IJOC.V0I0.624 (accessed on 31 Dec 2020).

Ramli M. Update Breast Cancer Management. Maj Kedokt Andalas. 2015;38:28–53.

Unger-Saldaña K. Challenges to the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer in Developing Countries. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:465.

Suparman E, Peran Estrogen dan Progesteron terhadap Kanker Payudara. J Biomedik. 2014;6:141–48.

Rustamadji P, Marisca S. Karakteristik Histopatologi dan imunofenotipik Kanker Payudara di RSCM Jakarta. Medicinus 2017;6:66–72.

Wiguna N, Manuaba I. Karakteristik Pemeriksaan Imunohistokimia pada Pasien Kanker Payudara di RSUP Sanglah Periode 2003-2012. J Med Udayana. 2014;3:1–13.

Chuang E, Christos P, Flam A, McCarville K, Forst M, Shin S, et al. Breast Cancer Subtypes in Asian-Americans Differ according to Asian Ethnic group. J Immigr Minor Heal. 2012;14:754–58.

Fulawka L, Halon A. Highlights the Most Significant Events & Trends in the Past Year of Cyberthreat Activity . Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60:177–84.

Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Panel HS. Personalizing the Treatment of Women with Early Breast Cancer : Highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann of Oncology. 2013;24:2206–23.

Tariq R, Huma S, Butt MZ, Amin F. Risk factors and prevalence of breast cancer - A review. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63:1075–78.

Pasaribu ET, Issakh B, Maritska Z. Trend Kanker Payudara di Semarang: Analisis Tipe Histologi dan Molekuler. J Kedokt dan Kesehat Publ Ilm Fak Kedokteran Univ Sriwijaya. 2018;5:108–13.

Hartaningsih NMD, Sudarsa IW. Kanker Payudara pada Wanita Usia Muda di Bagian Bedah Onkologi RSUP Sanglah Denpasar. J Med Udayana. 2014;3:1–13.

Nanto SS, Muhartono, Wulan AJ. Peran Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesteron Receptor (PR), dan Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) untuk Memprediksi Stadium Klinis Kanker Payudara The Role of Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), And HER2 untuk mempredisi stadiu. J Agromed Unila. 2017;4:256–59.

Lumintang LM, Susanto A, Gadri R, Djatmiko A. Profil pasien kanker payudara di RS Onkologi Surabaya, 2014. Indones J Cancer. 2015;9:105–10.

Fan L, Goss PE, Strasser-Weippl K. Current Status and Future Projections of Breast Cancer in Asia. Breast Care. 2015;10:372–78.

Brandt J, Garne PP, Tengrup I, Manjer J. Age at Diagnosis in Relation to Survival Following Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:1–11.

Syukri NA, Fidiawati WA, Tripriadi ES. Profil Pemeriksaan Indeks Proliferatif KI67 pada Penderita Kanker Payudara di RSUAD Arifin Achmad. JOM FK. 2016;3:1–13. 25. Nascimento RG do, Otoni KM. Histological and Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer: What Do We Know?. Mastology. 2020;30:1–8.

Rakha EA, Reis-filho JS, Baehner F, Dabbs DJ, Decker T, Eusebi V. Breast Cancer Prognostic Classification in the Molecular Era : the Role of Histological Grade. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(4):207.

Suarfi A, Anggraini D, Nurwiyeni. Gambaran Histopatologi Tumor Ganas Payudara di Laboratorium Patologi Anatomi RSUP M. HemeHealth and Medical Journal. 2019;1(1):7–14.

Setyawati Y, Rahmawati Y, Widodo I, Ghozali A, Purnomosari D. The Association between Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer with Histological Grade and Lymph Node Metastases in Indonesian Woman. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:1263–68.

Fragomeni SM, Andrew Sciallis, Jeruss JS. Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer Simona. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018;27:95–120.

Arnetha TS, Hernowo BS, Adha MJ, Rezano A. Relationship between Molecular Subtypes and Overall Survival of Breast Cancer in Bandung. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2020;13:1543–48.

Furqan M, Pohan PU. Relationship of Histopathology Grading with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Patients in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital 2016-2018. Scr SCORE Sci Med J. 2020;2:28–37.

Abubakar M, Sung H, Bcr D, Guida J, Tang TS, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Breast Cancer Risk Factors, Survival and Recurrence, and tumor Molecular Subtype : Analysis of 3012 Women from an Indigenous Asian Population. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20:1–14.

Park B, Choi J, Sung HK, Ahn C. Attribution to Heterogeneous Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Subtypes Based on Hormone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Receptor Expression in Korea. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:1–8.

Fallahpour S, Navaneelan T, De P, Borgo A. Breast Cancer Survival by Molecular Subtype: a Population-Based Analysis of Cancer Registry Data. C Open. 2017;5:E734–39.

Hennigs A, Riedel F, Gondos A, Sinn P, Schirmacher P, Marmé F, et al. Prognosis of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes in Routine Clinical Care : A Large Prospective Cohort Study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:1–9.

Yeh J, Chun J, Schwartz S, Wang A, Kern E, Guth AA, et al. Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Int J Breast Cancer. 2017:ID 1796145.

Wahba HA, El-hadaad HA. CurrentApproaches in Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment Modalities of TNBC. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12:106–16.

Sheikhpour E, Taghipour S. The Differences of Age, Tumor Grade, and Her2 Amplification in Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status in Patients with Breast Cancer. Int J Cancer Manag. 2018;11:8–11.

Lim E, Tarulli G, Portman N, Hickey TE, Tilley WD, Palmieri C. Pushing Estrogen Receptor Around in Breast Cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23:T227–41.

Tong ZJ, Shi NY, Zhang ZJ, Yuan XD, Hong XM. Expression and Prognostic Value of HER-2/neu in Primary Breast Cancer with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis. Biosci Rep. 2017;37:1–10.

Kanyilmaz G, Benli Yavuz B, Aktan M, Karaagac M, Uyar M, Findik S. Prognostic Importance of Ki-67 in Breast Cancer and Its Relationship with Other Prognostic Factors. Eur J Breast Heal. 2019;15:256–61.

Inwald E, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstadter F, Zeman F, Koller M, Gerstenhauer M, et al. Ki-67 is a Prognostic Parameter in Breast Cancer Patients : Results of a Large Population-Based Cohort of a Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:539–52.

Published
2021-12-13
Section
Articles