Perbandingan Indeks Larva Vektor Demam Berdarah Dengue Pra dan Paska-Intervensi di Kota Prabumulih

Hotnida Sitorus; Yulian Taviv; Anif Budiyanto; Lasbudi P Ambarita; Milana Salim; Rika Mayasari

doi:10.22435/blb.v13i1.253

Hotnida Sitorus Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Jl. A. Yani km. 7 Kemelak, Baturaja – Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
Yulian Taviv Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Indonesia
Anif Budiyanto Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Indonesia
Lasbudi P Ambarita Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Indonesia
Milana Salim Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Indonesia
Rika Mayasari Loka Litbang Pengendalian Penyakit Bersumber Binatang Baturaja, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22435/blb.v13i1.253

Keywords: Larvae Indices, Vector, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever, Prabumulih

Abstract

Prabumulih city is one of dengue endemic area in South Sumatera Province with number of cases in 2011-2012 were 225 and 301 cases respectively. The research aims to determine the influence of jumantik accompanied by health promotion program to the larval mosquitoes indices. This is quasi-experimental study, carried out in three endemic areas of Prabumulih City in 2014. There were two intervention in two location and one location for non-intervention. In the first location, the intervention were larva surveillance by jumantik cadre, giving larvicide selectively, accompanied by health promotion program to community group (intervention I), in second location the intervention only for larvae surveillance by jumantik cadre (intervention II), and the third location giving no intervention. Observation of immature mosquito was carried out in every location before and after intervention was given. The result showed an increase in Free larvae index of 19,8% in the intervention I , 12,5% in the intervention II and 5,3% in the no-intervention location. Indicator of breteau index showed a decrease in all location, 73,1% in the intervention I, 62,8% in the intervention II and 10,8% in the no-intervention location. Container index indicator showed a decrease in two intervention location, 10,2% in the intervention I, 6,6% in the intervention II, while in no-intervention location show an increase for 8%. Health promotion program about how to prevent dengue transmission through potential community groups could become an alternative effort to control vector population integrated with other control methods.

References

1. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Dengue Prevention and Control 2012-2020. Geneva; 2012.
2. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Modul Pelatihan Bagi Pelatih Pemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk Demam Berdarah Dengue (PSN-DBD) Dengan Pendekatan Komunikasi Perubahan Perilaku (Communication for Behavioral Impact). Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan; 2008.
3. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Data Kasus DBD per Bulan per Kabupaten/kota Di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2011 Dan 2012.(2012).
4. Koban A. Kebijakan Pemberantasan Wabah Penyakit Menular: Kasus Kejadian Luar Biasa Demam Berdarah Dengue (KLB DBD). http://theindonesianinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/06/09-POLICY-ASSESSMENT-Pemberantasan-KLB-Demam-Berdarah-oleh-Antonius-Wiwan-Koban-Juni-2005.pdf. Published 2005. Accessed March 1, 2014.
5. Notoatmodjo S. Pendidikan Dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2003.
6. Carrington LB, Simmons CP. Human to mosquito transmission of dengue viruses. Front Immunol. 2014;5(JUN). doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00290.
7. Koenraadt C, Tuiten W, Sithiprasasna R, Kijchalao U, Jones J, Scott T. Dengue knowledge and practices and their impact on Aedes aegypti populations in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(4):692-700.
8. Chanyasanha C, Guruge GR, Sujirarat D. Factors influencing preventive behaviors for dengue infection among housewives in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(1):96-104. doi:10.1177/1010539514545646.
9. Zulviana F, Ishak H. Hubungan Partisipasi Jumantik dengan Angka Bebas Jentik (ABJ) di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kassa-Kassi Kecamatan Rappocini. Media Kesehat Masy Indones. 2012;8(4):31-38.
10. Tapia-Conyer R, Méndez-Galván J, Burciaga-Zúñiga P. Community participation in the prevention and control of dengue: the patio limpio strategy in Mexico. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012;32(1):10-13. doi:10.1179/2046904712Z.00000000047.
11. Santi D, Budiono I, Wahyono B. Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Keberadaan Jentik Aedes aegypti (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Sukorejo, Kecamatan Gunungpati, Kota Semarang Tahun 2014). Unnes J Public Heal. 2015;4(1):69-75.
12. Pratamawati DA. The Role of Juru Pantau Jentik in Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever Early. J Kesehat Masy Nas. 2012;Vol. 6, No(2012):1-6.
13. Erlanger TE, Keiser J, Utzinger J. Effect of dengue vector control interventions on entomological parameters in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Vet Entomol. 2008;22(3):203-221. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00740.x.
14. Arunachalam N, Tyagi B, Samuel M, Krishnamoorthi R, Manavalan R, et al. Community-based Control of Aedes aegypti by Adoption of Eco-Health Methods in Chennai City, India. Pathog Glob Health. 2012;106(8).
15. Caprara A, Lima JWDO, Peixoto ACR, et al. Entomological impact and social participation in dengue control: A cluster randomized trial in Fortaleza, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015;109(2):99-105. doi:10.1093/trstmh/tru187.
16. Nam V, Yen N, Duc H, Tu Y, Thang V, et al. Community-based Control of Aedes aegypti by Using Mesocyclops in Southern Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(5):850-859.
17. Rodrigues M de M, Marques GRAM, Serpa LLN, et al. Density of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and its association with number of residents and meteorological variables in the home environment of dengue endemic area, São Paulo, Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8(1):115. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0703-y.
18. Barrera B, Amador M, Mackay A. Population Dynamics of Aedes aegypti and Dengue as Influenced by Weather and Human Behavior in San Juan, Puerto Rico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(12):e1378. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378.
19. Bowman LR, Runge-Ranzinger S, McCall PJ. Assessing the Relationship between Vector Indices and Dengue Transmission: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002848.
20. Edillo FE, Roble ND, Otero ND. The key breeding sites by pupal survey for dengue mosquito vectors, Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse), in Guba, Cebu City, Philippines. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012;43(6):1365-1374.
21. Marylene de Brito Arduino. Assessment of Aedes aegypti Pupal Productivity during the Dengue Vector Control Program in a Coastal Urban Centre of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. J Insects. 2014;2014(Article ID 301083):9 pages. doi:10.1155/2014/301083.